The two animation I have chosen are
the Short Vision and the Duck Amuck, which after viewing both of then, I found
share less similarities but have huge differences on varies aspects. I am going
the compare these two animations, and to conclude the differences and similarities
of both of them.
The Short Vision is an animation
with a water colour painting style vision, with old fashioned audio track and a
narrator with deep voice. The first half of the animation were comparatively
quiet and narrates the same message recurred 3 times but just the shifts of the
character. It used the technique of redrawing on the previous painting in order
to create the continuous effect when filming each painting. It is
deconstructive and touches lightly on political, and slightly abstract at the
same time. The meaning of the animation depends on what the audience interpreted.
It contains some sensitive and horror scene, therefore restricted the audience
by age.
The Duck Amuck is a formal
animation with a suitable length that is mainly made to amuse the audience,
whilst the age group of the audience is considered lower. It is a digitally
drawn animation, with amusing sound effect and a voice cover of the main
character, and again it reinforced the point that the purpose of this animation
falls on entertaining mainly. It conveys the information smartly to the
audience by having the main character talking in the first person to the audience
out of the screen, he interacts with the background of the animation as well.
In comparison of these two
animations, the style of drawing are totally different when one is hand-drawn
whilst the other one digitally drawn, the Duck Amuck face a younger age group
of audience, oppositely the Short Vision faces a comparatively mature age
group. It has a clearer story line though it is wild, and the Duck Amuck does
not have a main story but to serve the purpose of entertaining instead. Both animations
have got a narrator either behind the scene or the voice of the character.
No comments:
Post a Comment